Conceptual Relativism and Radical Social Constructionism

Concept Relativism focuses on the ability of human thinking to compose truth and knowledge, especially different reality People have reality of different versions, but reality is not true because the truth is the truth not true . (Lazar 1998) Many authors write this essence in their own language and have purchased many different perspectives on concept relativity. Daniel Little thinks that conceptual relativism is related to the fact that the world is divided into many different countries, cultures, religions and beliefs.

Social constructivism is a particularly radical form of conceptual relativism which is important in understanding scientific methodologies and themes. According to social constitutionism, the natural world studied by scientists is not engraved on its junction (using the metaphor of Plato from Phaedrus: 265 d - 266 a). The reality - its purpose, substance, attribute and category - can be found "not only there" but also only by empirical investigations or observations, instead being managed by various norms such as interpretation Constructed through socially recognized cognitive activities, explanation, data manipulation, etc. Social constitutionism brings about relativistic results because it claims that different social forces lead to the construction of different "worlds". And there is no neutral reason for the decision between them. Bruno Latour's "scientific research" approach is a typical example of constructivism with relativistic consequences

Concept Relativism is a type of relativism described in a narrow sense, in which existence theory or existential theory is related to conceptual solutions, scientific paradigms or classification frameworks rather than ethical and cognitive norms . In this sense, conceptual relativism is often described as a metaphysical doctrine, not a variant of epistemology or cultural relativism. The basic reason for this form of relativism is the anti-realism theory that the world does not present itself to ready-made or off-the-shelf items, and instead we use different, sometimes incompatible classifications Offers. And a conceptual way. Thinking about the relationship between thought and the world rather than empirical observation of historical and cultural diversity is the main driving force of various forms of conceptual relativism, but also supports anthropological and linguistic data It is used for.

Since other refinement of relativistic philosophical arguments, Alethic relativism is probably not only a few narrowly defined concept relativist versions, such as Nelson Goodman's impracticalism - plus a simple (Baghramian 2004: 92). For example, relativism on logic can be redone as a view that the position of a logical truth (including the truth about the relationship of results) is related to a cultural program or a cognitive program. Moral Relativism, the truth of moral judgment can be seen as an assertion that such truth, if any, is related to the background and culture.