Conceptions of the Social Contract Theory

Thomas Hobbes, John Rock and Jean Jacques Rousseau are political philosophers who have created their own theoretical social contracts. Social contract theory is a treaty or agreement that establishes a series of laws, organizes a functional society, and creates the need for governance. When people realize that there is no law, it will be carried out. Humans finally want safety and order. In order to gain safety and order, people voluntarily give up all rights and freedoms and should follow certain authority.

Political theorist John Rock played a major role in strengthening the constitutional philosophy. Rock is a British intellectual who helped to develop the concept of social contract theory. According to this theory, the government itself is a sort of contract between the people and the state, and unless the state abuses its power or stops it, the people have the right to invalidate the contract . . Is this concept familiar? Yes, my founder, the founder of America, is a big fan of rock and his idea provides a philosophical reason for the American Revolution.

British philosopher John Roc 's contribution to the principles of social contract theory had a major impact on the US Constitution. Social contract theory is the concept that state and state rights must be protected by the rights of specific individuals, the constitution and the foundation of the Western government. Locke prioritizes common interests over personal benefits. Because I believe that this is the only way to ensure that everyone has equal opportunities for life, freedom and happiness. Individuals can claim their interests through a democratic process, but in the end society is dominated by the majority

The theory of legality is closely related to the concept of social contract. The theory is based on the fact that companies are constrained by social contracts, in which businesses agree to agree to carry out various social expectation behaviors in exchange for their goals and remuneration for other fees There. . According to Ecological Socialist School (Pepper, 1996), since this social responsibility and profitability are not in harmony due to the neoclassical economic grounds of the social responsibility model, this theoretical discussion on the environment (CSR) Is invalid. On the basis of the