OP: The question of your question is not to learn how to actually draugh a person who learns "CAD" from the beginning rather than from drawing or drawing. Simply change the view or execute the command without knowing the projection and intersection of the entity. I do not intend to pretend to consider all schools and methods, but in general the descriptive geometry I have seen in recent years and the cuteness of drafting are outside the window.
Of course, it's not the same as building a 2-dimensional geometry, but there are unique skills and techniques, and there are various advantages of Freemasonry.
However, if your question relates to tools for building geometry, it is still meaningless question. Anyone can use it when using a straight edge or computer. We recommend using a very expensive straight edge without using a straight edge. How do you construct an equilateral triangle? And the Pentagon? Wait a moment ... old-fashioned shit. You can do it manually or you can use exactly the same technology on your computer - if you like
Process problems are important. Perhaps this is the basis of the original question - if this is a problem the expression is not good
Yawn I want to go to bed. Why are you talking to students in elementary school 10th grade? If you know how to do that, you can do geometry with strings, numbers, or some other way.
Focusing on comparison between k-2 students compared to paper and pencil, a meta-analysis including 26 studies conducted between 1992 and 2002 was conducted. For writing quantity (d = 0.5, n = 14) and writing quality (d = 0.41, n = 15), a significant average effect size was found to be beneficial to the computer. Studies focused on corrective behaviors between these two writing conditions (n = 6) reveal different results. A brief review of other studies collected for meta-analyzes that did not meet statistical criteria was also reviewed. These articles (n = 35) show that the computer classroom is more cooperative, repetitive, and social than the paper and pencil environment. for
My argument in this article is modest. A computer is just the latest step in a long list of writing techniques. In many ways, its development is similar to a pencil - so my title - the computer looks more complicated, but it is definitely more expensive. The credibility of pencil writing is still questionable. We like signatures and other permanent or verified documents. I do not know that someone really opposes the use of pencils when writing begins, but other reading and writing techniques, including writing themselves, were initially influenced by doubt and enthusiasm.
In a study conducted at the University of Clermont-Ferrand in France, subjects were asked to explain genuine and clear explanation while holding a pencil in their mouth to suppress muscle. The pencil was not in the mouth, the target was an excellent judge, but with pencils (when they could not imitate the smile they saw) their judgment was compromised. Charles Darwin developed the theory of facial feedback response, in addition to the theory of the theory of evolution of "origin of species". What is not a smile is just a good result)