Comparison on the Polybius from Punic Wars and Ssu-ma Chi’en

In the late 3rd century BC, in Southeast Asia and Europe, there were two independent powers in the Han dynasty and central area of ​​Rome. They all reached the climax of modern civilization. In addition, they beat the hostile forces and built the empire. The two empires are born, growing, and are perfect, and there is a big difference in dominating ideology and institution.

Greek politician Polybius (BC 200 - 1818) wrote his growing account of the Roman Empire to help his compatriots understand how their world was dominated by Rome It was. He vividly documented the important stage of the expansion of Rome and began the Ponge war in 264 BC. That battle in the Mediterranean, a temporary retreat by Hannibal, and the ultimate destruction of Carthage. As an active participant to the politics of his time and a friend of many famous Roman citizens, Polybius drew a lot of witness records while writing the cornerstone of history.

First of all, look at the Greek historian Polybius who is writing about the history of the Romans, our main source of information. He set a high standard for himself in the discussion on the "Buddhist war" and said that anyone who plays a "historian" must abandon all such considerations. He seems to follow the set of standards most ancient historical authors are trying to achieve, but when looking at the reasons for his reasons in the Second World War, I can see prejudice in the evaluation of Hamilka and Hannibal Another writer says that the intersection of Saguntham by Eblo and Hannibal is "the beginning" of the conflict and not the real "cause". Because of the anger of Hamil Kabassa and the expulsion of the Carthaginians from Sardinia, these reasons are even more evident. Cicero wrote a very long year after Polybius