Comparison of Two System Failure Incidents

Introduction This report details two recent system failure events that occurred in recent years. The fatal consequences of these disaster events are similar only to the adverse effects of many parts of the regional and global human infrastructure. The first thing to notice is the disaster of the Fukushima nuclear power plant. The second case was Tianyu gas explosion. Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster 1 Introduction Place: Honshu, Fukushima, Japan.

Eight prints, two broadcast clips, and the cover of two magazines were cross-referenced - the source of each event was the same. The choice of these two events is based on the similarity of those facts and the period of 20 years between the two events. The similarities and differences between the coverage of these two events may reveal the trend of media frameworks for these types of events over the past 20 years. Based on the release date of each article, the first two New York Times articles were chosen for comparison - each article was posted immediately after each incident. This comparison aims to measure the response of the original mainstream print medium for each event. Articles 3 and 4 were selected from the Wall Street Journal on the subject matter of the article on the impact of each incident. The purpose of this comparison is to analyze historically conservative news sources and confusion caused by anxiety of each incident.

Citing the number of crime cases between the two, the advocate of the taxi app was compared with the public transport system. In London, six times a year Uber is in operation, there are thousands of subway metro. However, as Uber and public transport are not suited for the same social class, these are at best just arguments. I am worried about the government's ineffective safety measures, but the violation of the law has played an important role in the processing of the Uber incident.

The above two figures show a comparison of RIP traffic sent in the Failure scenario and in the No_failure scenario. The first chart above shows overlap comparison and the second chart shows stack comparison. When a failure occurs in the RIP system, traffic transmission signals as well as traffic reception signals change. By observing the results, updating the routing information protocol will take longer than the NO_Failure scenario, so the results are different for the No_failure and Failure scenarios. Because the system needs to check, drop and retransmit the packet, it will take time to update.