Comparison of Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov in Crime and Punishment

Comparison of Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov in Crime and Punishment Dostoevsky is exploring the way of Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov in his book "Sin and Punishment". These two people have many similar problems and living obstacles. Both of us faced a spiritually unbearable long journey of committing murder and calling for redemption. They also share many of their personality traits. Their lives are very different because they are very different about life.

In Dostoevsky's "sin and punishment", the character Raskolnikov clearly shows the theory of character duality. Svidrigailov represents a cold, intellectual face of his personality, Sonia is an obvious example of the essence of others and is thoughtful. . Let's take a look at these independent elements of Raskolnikov's social identity. Svidrigailov is a unique representative of Raskolnikov intellectuals and emphasizes self-intention. He is also a superhistor of nihilism. He must be essentially evil in order to obey the universe as he feels the world is essentially a place of evil. Under this theory, the universe is meaningless and omnidirectional, or the human roughness is to satisfy appetite. All that Svidrigailov does is for his own pleasures and to transcend his common morality. Svidrigailov is not a real intellectual; however, he will not allow minor human behavior or morality or law to prevent him from advancing his way.

Svidrigailov also provided an extraordinary psychological portrait for a drunken Marmeladov, and a malignant involuntary person suffering from hallucinations. Raskolnikov's friend Razumikhin expresses dislike of the writer's ideological lifestyle; Razumikhin's own life reflects a way to solve the problem through a dramatic gambling rather than a slow and steady hard work. A slightly discreet Dostoevsky became the main character of the story, Sonia Mamelado. This is an unrealistic symbol of the merit of pure Christians. After she became a whore to feed her family, she later persuaded Raskolnikov to repent and let him go to Siberia. At the conclusion of the novel, the prisoner Raskolnikov initially acknowledged that he was not reflective, not emotional stress, initially maintained his immoral theory, but eventually he was inspired by the apocalyptic dream and Sonya It was. Good brings true confession. Criticism is divided as to whether the conclusion succeeds in art