Comparison of Imperialism and Globalization

This course provides critical insight into modern globalization by comparing it with the 19th century European imperialism using documents and political cartoons. To help students understand the historical aspects of imperialism, it is related to the terms they have heard before - globalization. In a modern environment, this seemingly difficult concept becomes easy for high school students to understand. Incorporating historical content into modern environments can improve student's overall relevance and participation. It also helps deepen understanding of complex terms.

This article first reviews the evolution of the term "imperialism" in the 20th century, incorporating the issues of globalization and imperialism into the recent world economic and social development. The recent trend of economic liberalization has an international dimension that is closely related to the increase in the use of the term globalization. Next, let's consider the four economic aspects of globalization, foreign direct investment, finance, trade, and international governance. In this brief review we consider the contradictions of these dimensions and that the term globalization incorporates both the nature of transboundality and contradiction of these phenomena and also shows a place of equal competition with peers is showing.

New colonialism or new imperialism is more important than capitalism, globalization and cultural empire to influence developing countries, rather than direct military control (imperialism) and indirect political control (hegemony) It is the use of principles. These issues were discussed in the work of Jean-Paul Sartre (1964) and Noam Chomsky (1979). Dependent theory is a theoretical account of economic new colonialism. It suggests that the world economic system will include rich countries with the core and poor countries in the vicinity. Economic new colonialism attracts human resources and natural resources of poor countries to the economies of affluent countries. We argue that poverty in neighboring countries is the result of how it has been integrated with the global economic system. Since the dependence theory comes from an analysis of the economic inequality of the global economic system by Marxism, the lack of marginal development is a direct result of the development of the core.