Comparison Between Orthodox and Critical Realism

Realism will try to rescue this deep, internal sense of loss from the center of modernism. We live in a rapidly accelerating world, it is strengthening our relationship with our world, and we are almost robbing the world of heredity. We have created it, but it feels like we have removed it. Realism is the soul that will save us. Because it tries to save us from the spiritual danger of losing contact with reality (lecture). The realistic view of the world is an essential point of view, that the important things of life are already present in the present world, not the imagination of existence (lecture, w1).

There is a difference between direct realism and critical realism. Critical realism claims to have two stages to experience the world. First of all, the feeling of conveying the subjects of experiences, people, events, and the stage of nest building is the sense of our psychological process after starting work. For example, in the cricket game, as a critical realist, while making a decision of the referee, the referee said, "I will give them according to his opinion!" Because they are! According to direct realism, the first stage of critical realism is enough to understand our experience level.

The simple way to think about the difference between direct realism and critical realism is as follows. Critical realism claims to have two steps to experience the world. The first is the sensation and transport of the object itself. Secondly, psychological treatment is done after a while since I felt satisfied with our senses. Direct realism says that the first step is enough. In pursuit of our example of cricket (or rugby), the referee, a critical reality, says he will decide the referee: hand it over. "

The first realism is direct realism. Direct realism says what you see is what you get: What we experience through the senses accurately portrays the world. The second kind of realism is called critical realism. Critical realityists believe that what we experience is not the emotion, that is to say direct, but the image in the real world. Critical realists point out that our sense often deceives us. For example, when you watch international football and cricket matches on the next TV, you will see that the sponsor will advertise in a prominent position in the actual stadium. It appears to be upright above the field. But this is an illusion. It is actually drawn on the grass. So what we really see is the sense that they are real expressions.