Comparing the Two Versions of To Build a Fire

Comparing the fire of the two versions, you can absolutely believe that "There is no similar treatment other than the topic itself" (544). Jack London wrote in December 1908 in response to the inquiry of Century Magazine editor Richard W. Gilde. Gilde just released 'To Build a Fire' in his own magazine, he was worried when he encountered another version released six years ago. For the explanation in London, the first story is a boy, the new story is a man, the only similarity is the theme itself.

An American writer, Jacques London's short story "Fire". There are two versions of this story, one issued in 1902 and one published in 1908. The story written in 1908 is a classic often chosen as a classic, little 1902 story is known. The 1908 version was about an anonymous hero who took his dog and entered the freezing forest of Yukon and visited his friends - ignoring the old warning about the danger of another hiking. The hero underestimated the harsh situation and began to freeze slowly. After failing to light a fire, he fell into a coma and died of hypothermia

After compareing and contrasting the movie and the short story version "To Build a Fire", this novel version is a more effective art form. If you tell stories and books, of course the story is more detailed. The same goes for movies, but it is not as good as a story. The story is easy to understand. If you do not understand it, you can go back and see. The difference between a story and a movie is that the story is more detailed and explanatory. It is interesting to read this story. When you see a movie it is too dull and flat. In the story, the man's explanation is better, his behavior is better. The five senses are better described in the story than the movies. This movie shows its strengths and pleasures; this movie is just a male and a dog going to camp. Dogs are well explained in stories rather than movies. In general, this story is more interesting and more detailed than a movie.