Comparing the Stories of Mark and Peter

The story that Jesus was put on the cross and resurrected is quite different from the Gospel and Peter. Each writer has his own plot, description language, audience, and the characteristics of Jesus. Our understanding of Jesus and how to draw him changed in the Gospel. For example, the Gospel of Mark uses many Jewish references and is similar to the Old Testament. It will serve the Jewish audience. Furthermore, it is expressed that the Jesus of the Marco Gospel is more sacred, consistent with the expectations of Jewish society.

Mark's story process is relatively simple. It begins with the scene where Peter appears in the Jordan River (Mark 1: 16-17). There is no description of birth talk, genealogy, shepherd. When Jesus (Jesus) was about 30 years old, Mark began with Jesus' civil servants. It enters direct action, and the first chapter contains miracles. Eighteen miracles of Jesus (similar to Matthew and Luca) are recorded in all Mark's Gospels, but compared to Matthew 18 and Luca 19 there are only five metaphors.

Both Mark and Matthew's two books describe Peter as one of Jesus' most important followers, but Mark is not widespread than Jesus' explanation of Jesus' life, but the spiritual cause of Jesus It seems to emphasize. Pursuit. Petro, a student and friend of Jesus, is one of the most frequently mentioned disciples in the story. But these two verses seem to draw different pictures of Jesus' outstanding disciples. In Matthew 's Gospel, Peter seems to have played a greater role in Jesus' teachings and seems to be more important to Jesus through the book. In Mark, he is still important, but not much to the author's eyes. Mark completely left Peter in several stories and touched only on the ultimate importance of Peter to Jesus. Every difference in the story about Peter changed his personality and role slightly.