Comparing Monsters: Frankenstein, Grendel, and Adolf Hitler

In the story of Anglo - Saxon, the monster 's Glendell was evil, but Adolf Hitler became synonymous with the evil of the 20th century. In fact, Hitler is often called "monster". In this article we compare Hitler and Glendell and explain their similarities and why they are suitable for the symbol of each evil in each era. These clauses show that Glendell could not establish friendship not only because of his living situation but also because he was descendant of Cain. Glendel's ancestors could not live near people, so no one can be his friend. Hitler did not grow up in hell like hell, but he grew up when another person was overlooked. Hitler made a step forward with internalizing the quality of time, so he could not get along with his friends.

Grendel is a monster. To judge people based on their appearance is not completely "moral", and as other stories like Frankenstein show, they know monsters when they see monsters. Glendale is hard to find his place in the world because he does not feel like a human; but they think he is different. Throughout the story, Glendell tried to discover who he truly is through various belief cycles. In the process of growth, Grendel has to establish his own beliefs. Ultimately, very few people want to be them. For example, take on the role of Glendell 's John Gardner. Although it seems that Glendel deliberately makes his tragic situation longevity, this process is created by what he thinks is "two dark reality, self and the world", or something inside It is clear that it is the result of a struggle. For many people, including Grendel, it seems to me that there is nothing but mainly a series of infinite conflicts between conflicts.