comparing knowledge and thinking

In the real world, each person is different because opportunity, purpose and way of thinking differ depending on the person. Of course, I can not receive mental training like any other person. As an individual, our thinking is based on our knowledge what we know. Our knowledge is another aspect of our choice. Personal thinking is the basic quality of each person's performance. They may not be the same. They can not think the same exact idea or feel the same emotions.

Ignorant hypotheses assume that when individuals face choice, they compare the level of knowledge of the relevant field with knowledge of other fields or other knowledge of the relevant field. Conversely, this comparison creates a sense of abilities and ignorance; when ignorant emotions arise, people think that the situation is ambiguous and try to avoid it. Specifically, Fox and Tversky (1995, 587) asserts as follows. When people's confidence is compromised "

Role of Behavioral Economics and Decision-making in American Retirement Savings Determination

Comparing "knowledge" and "belief", the contrast between knowledge and belief is the most obvious and direct. There is also an indirect or two-stage comparison between knowledge between acquaintance and "believing". First, knowledge of acquaintance is contrasted with explained knowledge, which is a sub-optimal alternative to it, and itself is a special case of "knowledge". The fact that the description applies only to one entity then contrasts with the belief to which it applies. This is the third best.

The conclusion of our discussion is this. When we explore the relationship between faith and knowledge, we focus on the relationship between beliefs and knowledge. In the latter term of Russell, we are comparing the two "propositional attitudes"; of course, they may be attitude toward the same proposition. If we compare beliefs with knowledge and treat them as low level alternatives to knowledge, contrast is primarily between "knowledge" and "belief". Similarly, when you define knowledge based on beliefs, you define "knowledge" according to "beliefs"; the remaining contrasts are contrasts of "knowledge" and "just" beliefs, or "equivalent". Comparing the "belief" of knowledge with the beliefs you do not know Let's see the difference between "believe" and "knowledge". What should I say?