Comparing John Stuart Mill's "concessions of women" with "Cassandra" of Florence's nightingale for thousands of years, women have struggled under male control. In many societies around the world, men have power and women have to fight to play an equivalent role in these patriarchal societies. Florence Nightingale wrote an article about such a society in her work "Cassandra" and John Stuart Miller further wrote in his article "female obedience." I wrote this topic. These two parts explore the same basic idea, but there are also differences.
Both "National News" and "London Daily Chronicle" compare this book with John Stuart Mill's "Female Posts." The former is called "up" and the latter points out that "the factory has never had a book dealing with the overall position of a woman closer to its idea and fantastic idea of the fair". "Sophisticated" argument about the lack of training of daily mothers' work in women, housewife, "Mrs. Stetson's only statement, like amateur mothers, amateur chefs, amateur cleaning, amateur seamstress I noticed. The world, the Boston magazine praised Gilman for the time above, not intertwined with feminist writers like the election, and honored her "fun wisdom" so that people can read her book It was. I heard a lot of "problems of women". "
John Stuart Mill is also an early supporter of feminism. In his article "Women's obedience" (published in 1869, 1869), Muller tried to prove that the women's legal conquest was wrong, and should give way to full equality is. He believes that both men and women should have equal rights in law and "everyone can not evaluate the difference between men and women until they have conditions of equality. Discover by discovering by making it possible to develop and use Mill.The Mill talks a lot about this imbalance and you can feel "real selflessness" that women do when they provide family to men I would like to know if or not. This selfless mill will encourage people to "consider the interests of society and the interests of individuals or small families."