Comparing Dickinson and Hughes

When comparing Dickinson and Hughes after reading Emily Dickinson's "Learning the truth but learning it," Langston Hughes's "Harlem", I think that the main difference between the two verses is the poet's vocabulary. Dickinson used an abstract vocabulary in poetry, using bright, fun, wonderful and dazzling words. The use of the word "truth" is itself a large abstraction concept. However, Hughes used more specific vocabulary such as raisins, ulcers, ulcers, meat, meat etc.

Dickinson's poetry tone is different from Hughes poetry's tone, Hughes' poetry curioshes curiosity, Dickinson is more persuasive. The spokesperson of "tell all the truth" is to say - to tell all the truth, to say that it is leaning, and the speaker of "Harlem" is more meditative and what is behind in a late dream I will ask if it happens. The images of these two verses left a firm picture in my mind. In "telling all the truths", the truth has this particular aura, and you feel it would be great to experience it, it will dazzle you. Also, as mentioned above, "Harlem" has created a picture of deterioration of dreams in some way. The use of fuse words makes it easier to place these images in front of us as we can see.

The authors used a completely different approach, but they clearly expressed their point. Dickinson is abstract and Hughes is more specific about his words, but they all use quite a metaphor, but Hughes is more than Dickinson. For example, Hughes used something similar in almost every line of his poem. Dickinson used just a little, like "lightning for children". Dickinson also uses anthropomorphization to gradually show off the truth, or uses the phrase "superb surprise" to call the truth a proper noun and make it a humanized letter.