Comparing and Contrasting Scientific realism and Phenomenology

The purpose of science is to reveal some kind of "truth" about the world and how it works. But how do we achieve this concept of "truth"? Research on the origin, nature and limitations of human knowledge production provides a number of frameworks to study from there. These methods involve the creation of knowledge and provide references to scientists and observers to test the limitations and validity of the knowledge generated from the study.

This research mainly applies to two philosophical paradigms, phenomenological research and interpretive research. Positism and realism as ideal scientific philosophy are often used in academic research but they believe that scientific truth can be confirmed from strong evidence and evidence from formal facts from quantitative data (Comte, 2005). However, the main purpose of this survey is to understand the impact of Apple's marketing on consumer awareness, and it is rarely proven using scientific quantitative data. Therefore, in this white paper, positivism and realism are excluded as a useful philosophy. Because they reduce the human experience to a given environment.

Discussions on scientific realism are closely related to almost all other aspects of scientific philosophy. Because they contain the essence of scientific knowledge. Scientific realism is a positive perception of our best theory and model content and it is recommended to believe in the observable and unobservable aspects of the world described by science. This cognitive attitude has important metaphysical and semantic aspects These different commitments are questioned by a number of competing scientific epistemologies collectively known as the form of scientific anti- realism I will. In this article I will explain what scientific realism is, outline its main variants, consider the most general discussion to support and oppose this position, and to compare it with its most important anti-realistic Compare with counterparts.

Scientific realism is related to many old philosophical positions, including rationalism and metaphysical realism. But it is a scientific paper on the development of the 20th century. Describing scientific realism in ancient times, medieval times, and early cousins ​​is at best misleading. The development of scientific realism is mainly a reaction to logical positivism. Logical positivism is the first of the philosophical and scientific realism of the 20th century and it is thought that there is a clear distinction between observational terms and theoretical terms.