Compare and Contrast Han China and Rome Essay

The empire outside may be very different and may look unique. But as you jump into their foundation, you will really start to realize their similarity. They are eager to survive in water and sunlight, and aspire to join them, starting with low seed so that spectacular pine and inconspicuous tomato plants look very different. The same can be said about Han Empire and the Roman Empire. There may be major differences, but their social structure, the cause of religion and collapse, unite them. Without a unified social doctrine, society can not exist like Han and Roman empire. There may be major differences between them, but their roots are the same, family based structures. More about this family ...

Through that process, religion has had a tremendous impact on society. The same can be said about the Han Chinese of the Roman Empire. In both societies, the origins of their main religion are very similar. Both are mainly based on the power of nature, maintaining the shrine in a pure and natural place. Polytheism is a common way and various gods are focusing on all aspects of nature, such as wind, fire and agriculture. The two empires also started with these nature-based religions and absorbed religious theories and practices of other cultures introduced to them. However, the introduction of their religion and custom is quite different. In Rome, Christianity was introduced and widely accepted. Of course, this is after years of persecution and discrimination. Christianity promotes faith in monotheism or a single god, but it casts doubt. Because of this custom, many of the early Christians were punished not to worship the Emperor as a god. After many years of confusion and bloodshed, Christianity was accepted by society. In Han Chinese, different religions are effective, or there are two religions in technology. These are Dow and Buddhism. Doasim brings the magic and mythological beliefs practiced primarily by ordinary people. In Taoism, practicing alchemy to find medicines is very common.

In addition, agriculture of Roman and Han nationality was compared. Another similarity shared between Rome and Han civilization is architecture. Roads were originally built to support military journeys, but these same roads were later used to spread the trade and culture of each empire. The religious activities of Rome and Han are different. Buddhism became the dominant religion in Han Chinese, and in Rome the main religion was Christianity. Unlike Christianity maintaining its original perspective, Buddhism is willing to adapt to Chinese traditions and beliefs.

The similarities between Rome and Han are the role of gender, economic production method, and architecture. The difference is family composition, class composition, and religious practice. The role of Rom and Han's gender is similar. For example, both civilizations are patriarchal. Because men are closest to their ancestors, they will maintain the happiness of their families and ensure that they will continue to maintain the family's honor. The difference between Rome and Han is in the family composition. Han people believe that personal behavior reflects the whole family and its hierarchy; in contrast, Rome is more tolerant of individuals affecting family ratings. The Romans were generous because Confucianism was not equal in Roman society.

Roman hierarchy does not depend entirely on personal norms and behavior. The family structure of these two civilizations is irrelevant, but they are relative in terms of economic production methods. Both Roman and Han civilizations adopt the same economic production method. Agriculture is a major element of the Roman economy and the Han Chinese economy. In the annual harvest, both empires have earned a certain percentage of income, which funds the government's activities. The class structure contained in the civilization of Rome and Han are very different from each other. In China, opportunities to improve the economic and social status of individuals are very limited, but in Rome it is not so restricted. The lack of trade and intervention by the Roman government leads to a more economical flow