Community Policing vs Broken Windows: What’s the Difference?

Two different policing theories functional, but conceptually related, emerged in the early 1980s. Broken Windows and community policing. Although the two theories actually take different forms, they all arise from the same basic concept that law enforcement officers must actively participate in their communities to reduce serious crimes. There is little data comparing the effectiveness of policing strategies generated by these theories, but we can discuss their differences in concept and practice.

Broken Windows theory was written in 1982 by social scientist James Q. Wilson and George L. Khering. The name "broken window" is based on a metaphor that evidence-based crime prevention centers are described as follows.

"The model focuses on the importance of obstacles in the occurrence and maintenance of more serious crimes (eg broken windows), which is not directly related to serious crimes.Informal society The level of control has declined and entered. "

The original and most remarkable of the broken Windows theory was carried out by New York Police, but it is also a fundamental theory to develop police strategies for national law enforcement agencies. Policies based on broken Windows development often involve staff becoming more common in troubled communities with the aim of restoring order and reducing the fear of residents' serious crimes

As broken Windows was introduced to the law enforcement community, the community policing theory spread. The theory behind community policing is explained most accurately by the Ministry of Justice Community Oriented Police Service (COPS) as follows.

"Community policing supports systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques to promote organizational strategy and actively deal with direct situations leading to public security problems such as crime, social turmoil, fear of crime, etc. It is a philosophy to do. "

Community policing encourages executives to interact with residents in a non-compulsive way and to promote an active relationship with community members. More serious criminal acts

Basically, the theory of broken windows is about the power of face-to-face security by police patrol. Even if the crime rate does not rise, people walking in the area make people feel more secure. The difference lies in the perception of order and the obvious personal interests of the neighborhood. But the central question of destroying window policing - and the problem that dominates us to rethink it today is how the police maintain their order of views. As Kylyn and Wilson said in 1982:

Community policing encourages executives to interact with residents in a non-compulsive way and to promote an active relationship with community members. More serious criminal acts

The regulation of broken windows security or quality of life is based on criminal theory called broken window theory. This theory suggests that repairing broken windows in buildings and other forms of physical barriers in the city indicates the presence or absence of a crime. Converting to policing strategy, the purpose of minor crime is to prevent more serious and serious crime. Reformers point out that ways in which window surveillance is obstructed will adversely affect the color community through criminalization and excessive power. In addition, it is often seen as the cause of excessive security and militarization of the community. Opinion of drugs, crime such as "suspicious" activity, or mental health crisis often leads to a definition of local turmoil and a stronger need for security. Opponents of broken window rule and theory believe that this led to intrinsic criminalization of poor people, minorities and homeless.