Communities Should Welcome Wal-Mart

The community should welcome the Wal-Mart and you want to be punished for doing so well - for example, to operate your business effectively, it is a satisfying number of customers We will attract. Well, this is exactly what Wal-Mart is doing more and more. Recently, the City Council of West Covina, California has decided to refuse to sell land for developers building Wal-Mart stores on the site. The Committee is concerned that Wal-Mart's stores "threaten" other businesses and replacing high-income jobs in the region with low-income businesses.

Organization Profile: Wal-Mart Wal-Mart is the world's largest retailer. From the standpoint of Wal-Mart, the company is responsible for contributing to supporting community of stores. As an organization, the success of Wal-Mart is attributed to its business people. Wal-Mart asks the community to continue the business, Trevino and Nelson said, "The main stakeholders of the business must be the community of the company and other organizations."

What the company can do for success and what the company should do for success are two different aspects. In the case of Wal-Mart, the customer seems to have more power. Or, they are priority stakeholders. Suppliers of Wal-Mart are not "preferred", many communities are boycotting Wal-Mart, employee treatment is scrutinized. For example, the Nike group boycotted Nike against child labor. However, in general, there is no systematic cohesion or sound cohesion in these groups. Therefore it is imminent that some of the more powerful stakeholders may affect the risk of ethical decision making in a manner that does not satisfy the consumer's overall interests.

Given the fears that Wal-Mart has brought to the community, the results of an investigation into the economy of a federal communiqué company are almost self-evident. Wal-Mart has dropped the reputation of everyone, but it is not a threat many people fear about economic benchmarks related to at least a healthy and evolving community. For example, Wal-Mart is widely believed to have the effect of damaging local companies and employment opportunities and reducing wages. But the result of federal registration is the opposite. Companies in Wal-Mart County have grown, employment and gross income have increased slightly, and in some cases even in retail stores. According to the survey, retail sales are decreasing in almost all places in the surveyed counties. But they actually decreased in the Walmart County.

Changes in employment of retailers other than Wal-Mart can only occur as a result of extensive changes in the retail industry. Therefore, by measuring the difference in the average employment change in the counties other than Wal-Mart County and Wal-Mart County, you can eliminate the effects of widespread change in the retail industry. Changes over time and differences between retail employment among counties are indicators of changes in retail employment brought about by the establishment of Wal-Mart. Changes in retailing employment may be the result of economic events other than retailing, such as changes in the employment base within the county. To explain these possibilities, we repeat the above exercises for our two control industries (manufacturing and service). Distinguishing the difference between retail industry employment change and dominant employment change in the industry further separates employment changes caused only by Wal-Mart and eliminates the impact of industry-specific events.