Einland's novel national anthem is a political sarcasm, the word "I" is forbidden and very advanced in the grouping of the future society. World conquest by various committees, they are the only reason for the survival of mankind is "the great truth" (Land, 20) that "everyone is one and who will not save who" I believe that it is to strengthen. Signs of personal independence are killed quickly and brutally, and those who violate the law are punished by severe imprisonment or death penalty.
Let's start with the last expression of this theme: "Individualism and collectivism, not politics, human soul". Ianland is a strong opposition of collectivism philosophy. What is collectivism? Collectivism is the idea of putting groups or groups in front of individuals. It is the basic philosophy of political systems such as socialism, communism and fascism. Currently, Ianland denies political collectivism. "Belonging to the group, that the individual who may be for their own benefit has no right, his life and work" to "her" whether it is a race, class or state, an individual conquering She writes, she wrote, collective production ". In the national anthem sacrificing herself, Ain Land paints a depressed future society, it will be collectivism as the essence of its political system.
But this is only a part of Ianland's criticism of collectivism. This is a depiction of seeing collectivism as a political regime. Well, Al Ain Land is deeply concerned about the political system of collectivism, I remember when she was writing the national anthem in a global sweeping society, sweeping the world. You have the Soviets, you have Nazi Germany, you have fascist Italy. Groupitarian totalitarian politics knows that the political campaign occupying the world is increasing. But what is Ainland? . . So collecting is undoubtedly concerned about the politics of collecting, so so collectibles basically possible because she is really a source of collectivism, because it is a source of collectivism. This is far beyond the issue of collectivism rather than the view as a political regime.