Collapse of the Conscience

In ordinary society, people want adults to know the right things and bad things, but they can deceive the brain. According to Siegmund Freud's principle of psychoanalysis, the person's consciousness is "self experiencing the outside world through emotion, playing the referee between identity and supergo" (Tyson 25). Id belongs to a person's deep desire for lack of fear against social ban and result, and super ego is a moral rule taught by society and family. In Joaquim Maria Machado de Assis' short story "The Fortune - Teller", there is conflict between him and himself when Camillo encounters an unethical behavior including his best friend Villela.

After the collapse of the city state, conscience was formed in the Greek world. Close integration of politics and morality, and the former superiority is no longer impossible: outside the individual there is not enough close power to effectively guide action. Therefore, as a pis allergy, men as the only authority regain internal punishment for conscience. (Pierce 1955: 76) There are three main arguments that can be used to protect the principle of conscience freedom. Two of them are common in philosophical literature in the 16th and 17th centuries. They are "invalid or hypocritical arguments" and "ignorant arguments" (Sorabji 2014: 139). John Stuart Mill proposed the third argument. It may be called "legalization argument". Let's check in order

a) Invalid or hypocritical arguments are based on the correlation between beliefs and actions and the definition of conscience. According to this argument it is impossible for someone to believe or believe in something, that is to change conscience. What we can do is to make people behave as if they believe something. This is a hypocritical act. Therefore, if some authority aims to convert people or change the moral values ​​of people, forbidding the freedom to express their own conscience through behavior does not achieve this goal.

Studying a small number of people still intact and not guilty of the moral collapse of Nazi · Germany, even if the government legalized, they experienced great moral conflicts and conscience crisis There will be no. There is no doubt that crime is still a crime. And it is best not to participate in these crimes under any circumstances. In other words, they do not feel duty, even if they are no longer self-evident for the surrounding people, they act on obvious ones. So, if so, their conscience has no obligation.