Cold War Analysis

Robert Jervis' s article "The Impact of the Korean War on the Cold War" insists that the Korean War solved the contradiction and its defense efforts of US foreign policy between 1946 and 1950. This establishes an important new policy. Furthermore, if the Korean War does not occur, other events will not happen. In addition, the authors analyze these theories to outline their deep-rooted factors (563-564) that contributed to the Cold War and the bipolar US economic system.

In an attempt to analyze the transition from the international relations system after the Cold War to the post-Cold War system, an analysis of the general nature of the system itself, in this case the Asian international relations system, stakeholders, and their roles included. How the changes in the political environment and the specific policies of the actors affect the evolution of the new system, and finally the essence of the new system with its own actors, new roles and new concerns

Analysis of the old triangle containing the new content in the United States and Japan shows many features of the transition from the Cold War to the international relations system after the Cold War. During the Cold War, both Tokyo and Washington developed China's policies to hinder the design of Moscow in China and Asia. The Japan-U.S. Alliance no longer acts together to keep the Soviet regime in balance, the Japan-U.S. Alliance is no longer an important force to balance the strength of China and the Soviet Union, and both Japan and China follow the policies of the United States I will not build a relationship. The triangular relationship after the Cold War in Japan and the United States after the Cold War highlighted the concerns of the three countries concerning economic prosperity and trade, that is, the US policy to put trade at the center of Japan-US relations, China emphasizes that economic modernization is the key to foreign policy , Emphasizing the "expansion and equilibrium" policy of Japan. Who is changing with anyone

William Wolfphos at the end of the Cold War. An analysis of the Soviet (and US) policy of William Wolfforce during the Cold War further clarified understanding of the centrality of ideas and beliefs. Like Zakaria, Wohlforth considers national behavior to be the most fundamental alliance formed by the alliance. The left-wing regime of the Middle East and the United States was not so, but he did not regard this behavior as an ideological motive. 95. The origin of the alliance, Walt, 149, 168, 266; and Stephen M. Walter, "The formation of alliances and balance of world politics", Brown, Lynn-Jones and Miller, The Anarchy danger, p. , P. 243 (I emphasize the original). 96