Clip The Atlantic The Grim Conclusions of the Largest-Ever Study of Fake News (Mar. 8) | MIT News

Researchers at Sloan and Media Labs have studied why fake news spread faster on Twitter than de facto information. Robinson Meyer says: The author wrote that "fake news is prospering because people are more likely to spread it than robots," he said.

As I do not know, we like fake news. This research by Massachusetts Institute of Technology has proven MQ. "This extensive new research analyzes all the major controversial English news articles on Twitter - and discovers that the truth can not simply compete with mischiefs and rumors - Overturning the truth of Twitter is a general indicator, counterfeiting news and fake rumors are transmitted to more people, deeply penetrated into social networks, more than accurate stories.

According to a survey by Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which Twitter has invested in, "fake news" tends to expand online more quickly than it actually is. More specifically, researchers are more likely to lose a lie to Twitter (compared to the actual statement) by 70%, reaching a threshold of 1,500 (story) six times ago I concluded. According to the currently completed "proof of concept" test, this block chain is not yet ready to be used mainstream and its conclusion is very consistent with the conclusion of other major banks and regulators (the story ).

Fake news spread faster than real news - it's not the fault of the robot. According to a new study by Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Twitter users like to share sensational lies. This survey needs to support requests on specifications of the online platform that is not responsible for the news that users share. They insist on giving people what they want, but sometimes people do not know what it is for them. Spotify may not be able to produce huge profits. According to Strategy's Ben's Thompson, he is a famous blogger / analyst / sprout media bigger who analyzed Spotify's business before becoming famous. In a sense, Spotify looks like Dropbox, but its earnings are growing much faster than operating costs. But Spotify has only the price of Dropbox - there is music copyright. Spotify has not figured out ways to control these costs