Climate Change Papers

"North-South integration and CO 2 emissions allocation" (through collaboration with H. Llavador and J. Silvestre) Climate change 2015

"Over generational discount for climate change analysis: Answers to Partha Dasgupta"

(With H. Llavador and J. Silvestre) "If you do, what else can you keep? Consumption or quality of life?" In 2013, R. Fouquet, Energy and Climate Change Handbook, Palgrave

(With H. Llavador and J. Silvestre) "Dynamic Analysis of Human Welfare on the Warm Earth", "2011 Journal of Public Economics"

(Co-authored by H. Llavador and J. Silvestre) Network supplement for "dynamic analysis ...", publisher, 2011 Journal of Public Economics

(With H. Llavador and J. Silvestre) "Intergenerational Justice in the Uncertain Future World", Journal of Mathematical Economics 2010, 728-761

"Ethics of temporal distribution in warming planets", Environment and resource economics, 2011, 363-390

(With H. Llavador and J. Silvestre) "Sustainability of Global Warming: Theory and Experience", UNDP Discussion Paper 2011

As I mentioned earlier, I present another paper on personal view on global warming and climate change. If you do not believe in the theory of global warming and climate change this paper is not that important. But even though you believe in the theory of global warming and climate change, the energy policy proposed in this paper is the best way anyway. Even people who have lived for 20 to 25 years from now are not born, even those who live for 5 to 10 years, the population of the world continues to increase today. It does not exist and is moving around in cars and transportation systems that do not even exist today. It is probably based on designs, materials and technologies that do not exist today.

Look at a butterfly ecologist named Camille Parmesan who published a paper on "Climate and Species Range" accusing the California checker spot butterfly climate change that caused extinction in northern California. This paper was quoted over 500 times and invited to give a lecture at the White House and asked to contribute to the IPCC's Third Assessment Report. Unfortunately, the prominent ecologist Jim Steele mistook her conclusion: for urban development, the southern extinction of the butterfly's extinction disappears from the north, so only statistical averages are butterflies I move north. In any case, there is no relevant local temperature change and the butterfly is recovering over the whole range. Parmason's paper continues to be quoted as evidence of climate change. Steel was also ridiculed as "Daniel"