Clash of Ignorance, by Edward Said

When we entered the new millennium, Edward Said's article "ignorance of conflicts" appeared in the book of "citizens" on 22 October 2001. His paper is a critical answer to my paper, civilization first published in 1993. In the coming years, many people think that his argument is a valid counterargument to my thesis, but his argument is more based on the concept of a clash of civilizations described in my thesis. In this article we discuss and solve his argument.

Edward Saeed responded to Huntington's paper at the 2001 article "Ignorant Conflict". Sayed believes that the classification of the fixed "civilization" of the world by Huntington ignores the dynamic interdependence and interaction of culture. As an old critic of the Huntington style paradigm and a candid advocate of the Arab question, Edward Saeed (2004) also noted that discussions on civilization arguments are "an example of purely whimsical racial discrimination Mimicry Hitler science and Muslims for today's Arabs (p.293)

Huntington's critics are Edward Said, an American literary critic Edward Morning. He wrote an article entitled "Ignorant Conflict" to the left-handed magazine "Country" shortly after September 11th. Mr. Huntington confused a very diverse religion with believers from many different cultures and citizens, Saeed said. Mr. Said inquired if it is more fair to compare the Islamic terrorism network Al Qaeda and its leader Osama bin Laden with a violent cult in other parts of the world. An example presented is David 20.

Mr Edward said that this is a lecture on the conflict of civilization at the University of Massachusetts and people's ideas about it. He answered to the clash of the civilization which Samuel Huntington and Bernard Lewis said mainly. Edward received a master's degree in 1960 and a doctorate from Harvard University in 1964. His most important work is Orientalism, which is part of post colonial research. In this video, Said believes that Lewis and Huntington have ideas about clashes of wrong ideas and civilizations.

In this lecture, Edward responds to the remarks of Huntington and Lewis on the clash of civilization and criticizes their views. Huntington believes there is a confrontation between the countries in the future; this conflict is primarily a religious confrontation. Huntington said the West should be strong and that other countries should remain weak. It is obvious here that he wants Western countries to attack other countries and use them for occupation because he is considering colonization in Western countries. In his argument, he focused on Islam, he said that he is the main reason for the conflict. He said that Muslims are anti-Western, Muslims use violence against non-Muslims, and governments and other Muslim organizations encourage violence against them.