Civil Disobedience and It's Relation to the Democratic Process

To make progress, it has to consume and test the reality around it. Throughout human history individuals and groups have consistently violated the laws that they believe are unfair and have always promoted social progress based on their own motives. The concept of democracy is revolutionary, it is a collective reality microcosm because different actors are always collected in a feedback loop so that their motives are always combined and balanced.

In a democratic society, civil disobedience does not constitute a crime. If a disobedient person is to be punished by law, it is not due to civil disobedience, but it is not due to civil disobedience, it is not a matter of shutting down the road, disturbing peace, infringing or destroying property, It is due to official crime committed. Therefore, if a judge sometimes persuades that a judge punishes an objection, or does not punish her in a way different from another person who violates the same law, the judge follows the characteristics of a particular feature or action It must be distinguished from the behavior of ordinary criminals. open

In many countries democracy and dictators are seen as civil disobedience and the two forms of government are completely different from each other but punish all forms of disobedience that affect the government It is common to. Most people understand why democracies such as the United States exercise individual rights and punish protecting their rights. Constitution Even if the right in a democratic country is a citizen's disobedience to the right to hurt people? The answer to the previous question can only be answered appropriately only by individuals deeply affected by civil disobedience; however, individuals who have the right to speak to his or her government will answer the answer to the latter question can do.