Civil Disobedience: Are We Morally Obliged to Obey Unjust Laws?

We are morally obliged to obey even unfair laws. This problem caused a discussion about what we call civic disobedience. Eliot Zahsin, author of "civil disobedience and democracy", cited the citizen's disobedience as "a blatant violation of public norms (restricted by local governments, but ultimately disabled by the court There is a possibility) Form of protest: It is non-revolutionary, open, non-violent (ie, physical violence is not used in addition to self-defense when participants are physically attacked) ). Zashin, 118) Viewpoint from Carl Cohen Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Michigan

Citizens dispute against obeying the law or accepting conscience as a principle of illegal behavior and oppose it. Supporters of civil disobedience are often used as a form of passive resistance and support their illegal behavior using their ethics to raise their awareness of their plight. Many people face beating, imprisonment, even death to pursue change and revolution. Violation of the law caused a dispute over civil disobedience. Advocates of civil disobedience have many opinions that clearly support their views on this topic.

We are morally obliged to obey even unfair laws. This ethical problem solves what we usually call civil disobedience. In order to discuss the disobedience of citizens properly and to discuss whether it is moral to violate the law, we must first explain the characteristics of citizens' disobedience. Peter Singer's "Practical Ethics" began to express disobedience of citizens as "mismatch disagreement" and "even if the law protects and sanctions our completely mistaken things" (singer 292) .

We are morally obliged to obey even unfair laws. This problem caused a discussion about what we call civic disobedience. Eliot Zahsin, author of "civil disobedience and democracy", cited the citizen's disobedience as "a blatant violation of public norms (restricted by local governments, but ultimately disabled by the court Forms of protest: It is non-revolutionary, public, and non-violent (ie, when participants are physically attacked, in addition to self-defense, they use physical violence 118) One, Karl Cohen, a colleague professor of philosophy at the University of Michigan