Chinese Paleontologists Create a False Fossil Link Between Birds and Dinosaurs

Chinese paleontologists created false fossils between birds and dinosaurs Richard Monastsky 's article on Science News Online, published in January 2000 Confused with birds and dinosaurs 6 in science journal Nature There seems to be an interesting exhibition of corresponding articles published after the month. In the article of Science News Online, an article "A longan dinosaur with a silky skin in the Yixing Tier of China" refers to forged fossils made up of Chinese scientists and provides fossil links between birds It seems to suggest a possibility. dinosaur

For decades, paleontologists are the only fossil connection between birds and dinosaurs, Archeoptery, a mixed animal with feathers, but the tail of a long bone with teeth and dinosaurs. These animals seem to have acquired features of feathers, feathers, flying birds within 10 million years - a moment of evolution. Michael Benton, a paleontologist at the University of Bristol in the UK, says: "Archeoptery seems to be perfectly matured with the characteristics of modern birds."

Relationship between birds and dinosaurs One of the problems that has plagued many paleontologists for centuries is "Is the bird a dinosaur?" Paleontologists repeatedly insisted to prove or refute every aspect of the theory. So far supporters have supported their side through bone structure, bone organization, ideas like dinosaur feathers. Some people may react to this problem

When asked to an ordinary paleontologist familiar with vertebrate phylogeny, it may be said that a bird is a dinosaur. With the proper terminology, birds are dinosaurs of birds, other dinosaurs are dinosaurs other than birds, and birds (sounds strange) are technically considered reptiles. Is it too technical? Only semantics? Perhaps, still a good science. In fact, the majority of evidence supports birds as descendants of Manilapuran dinosaurs, which are similar (but not identical) to small dramasosau. What is this evidence?