China’s cultural future: from soft power to comprehensive national power

The Hu Jintao government uses "Four in one" expressions to coordinate China's development, namely economic development, political development, cultural development and social development. Use the term "soft power" to conceptualize cultural development. This paper used the tripartite taxonomy method to study China 's soft power law, "resource", "strategy" and "result". China's soft power is mainly used in the context of domestic policy, which means accumulation and accumulation of cultural resources. Soft power can be measured as part of the national strength and can be compared with the hierarchical status of other national states. Soft power as a strategy means soft use of power when pursuing normal economic and political superior abroad. The result of soft power means the rise of China and its cultural revival

External Relationship> Comprehensive State Power: Comprehensive National Power (CNP) is an indicator designed by the People's Republic of China to measure the general power of the nation state. It considers military factors (called hard power) and economic and cultural factors (called soft power). It is widely believed that the main objective of modern China is to maximize CNP in the country, but according to their own forecasts, they can not exceed the United States, Russia and the UK during this century.

The future prospects for China's soft power will ultimately depend on whether China will be a stable, prosperous, fair country that is stable. Given the big domestic problems in China, many countries choose to blindly follow their example unless China demonstrates it as an economic success story and a constructive political role for the world There is little to do. Does the interests of the United States and China contradict in developing countries, or converge? US observers including the media focus on the strategic competitiveness of the US and China in developing countries. However, the interests of America and China are very different. Both countries recognize the danger of international threats from developing countries and their security is closely related to weakest and most unstable stability, security and overall well-being in these areas doing. These two countries

In today's interrelated world, countries can achieve goals more effectively with soft power rather than hard power. Many people think that Britain is the country with the weakest power due to the increase in oral English. London is widely known as the world's most international city and is a place of natural encounter between people and organizations of the world. China is an institution like Confucius Institute's global network and is developing its own soft power.