Child welfare versus parental autonomy: medical ethics, the law, and faith-based healing.

Over the past three decades, more than 200 children died of treatable diseases in the United States, as parents relied on psychotherapy instead of traditional medicine. 39 states have laws to protect parents from criminal proceedings for death of children as they are not receiving treatment. As a doctor or citizen, we choose to either protect the welfare of our children, to practice the religions they chose or to respect the parent's right to make important decisions for our children It must be. In order to develop and protect these options, our healthcare professionals understand the history and background of such practices, and the legal aspects of previous affairs, and in psychotherapy with the community of religious dialogue as well We must develop an ethical composition to start our beliefs. . This article provides a framework for these requirements.

Medically, respecting patient's personal autonomy is considered as one of many basic ethical principles in medicine. Autonomy can be defined as the ability of individuals to make decisions themselves. This belief in autonomy is the core premise of the concept of informed consent and joint decision-making. This idea is considered a necessary condition for today's medical practice, but it has developed over the past 50 years. According to Tom Beauchamp and James Childress (the principle of biomedical ethics), the Nuremberg trial details the horrible "experimental" of exploitative medicine that violates the physical integrity of the subject and personal autonomy. These events have encouraged the need for safeguards in medical research such as the Nuremberg law that emphasizes the importance of voluntary participation in medical research. The Nuremberg law is considered to be the premise of many existing documents on research ethics.

In biomedical ethics, the concept of patient autonomy is a major consideration. This autonomy is in stark contrast to the so-called medical parent's style. Medical parental style refers to a physician who does not consider the patient's true wishes based on what they believe that they are most appropriate for the patient. This is an intervention to the right to take personal actions for reasons related to personal welfare and interests. While parents' medical styles may be considered positive, a lot of people are contesting it. In Goldman 's paper' Refuts to Parents' Medical Style 'he talked about why medical parents' style is incorrect.

- Autonomy: Autonomy, an important principle of medical law and ethics from the 20th century to the 21st century, is the ability to think, choose, decide, act for myself. This consideration has received wide attention from society in individual autonomy and self-determination which has grown considerably over the past 50 years. Many people seeking legalization of abortion are based on the rights of women who choose to happen in her body. - Autonomy restriction: The concept of all autonomy is limited. Thus, for example, if (a) a person has the ability and (b) is within the range of exercising autonomy that does not adversely affect the autonomy of others, it can only be autonomous. Therefore, in law and morality, autonomy is generally considered to be limited. Individuals can select and act in a manner harmful to themselves, but they do not have the same freedom of choice and do not take actions that hurt others.