Chemical Weapons: Weapons of Mass Destruction

Symptoms of blood poisoning vary with concentration and exposure time. The next class of drugs is called blood drugs. People killed by blood products have bright red blood because they prevent the body's cells from using oxygen in the blood. They affect the body by being absorbed by the blood, they act very fast, and they reveal themselves at room temperature. Blood products can affect not only the eyes but also the respiratory tract. Low dose exposure to blood products has little effect, but prolonged exposure can cause dizziness, weakness and nausea. .

Since the 1930's, weapons of mass destruction existed. Weapons of mass destruction can better be identified as nuclear weapons, biological weapons, chemical weapons or radiation weapons. - Historically, nuclear weapons were used twice at the end of World War II. The first bomb was abandoned in Hiroshima on August 6, 1945 and the second bomb fell to Nagasaki three days later. These bombs broke through the limits of human imagination and innumerable innocent people were killed. Fortunately, these are the first two nuclear bombs used so far.

Can biological weapons used in history be classified as weapons of mass destruction like modern nuclear weapons, biological weapons, chemical weapons? In modern times, we know that nuclear weapons, biological weapons and chemical weapons are weapons of mass destruction, but it can be said that biological attacks occurred early in the 6th century BC. We now know that bacteria, toxic and toxic weapons can produce, for the production of massive casualties. Can these wars over 2500 years old be regarded as the first in the long history of the biological weapons era?

Biological weapons such as chemical weapons, radiation weapons, and nuclear weapons are often referred to as weapons of mass destruction, but the term biological weapons is not actually applied. Fatal biological weapons can cause massive death, but they can not destroy infrastructure, buildings or equipment on a large scale. However, because of the indiscriminate nature of these weapons - and the possibility to start a widespread epidemic, the difficulty of controlling the effects of the disease, and the simple fear they cause - I agree to prohibit