Characterization Of The Physician

Direct depiction: Dr. Physics He likes astronomy very much. He ensured that his patient was not suppressed by constellation and magic. He can make a patient feel a rich life. He is a very good doctor. He knows the cause of each disease. His patient paid him. He read many medical books written by famous doctors such as Esculapius, Deiscorides, Hippocrates, Hali. He is cautious about his diet and he has never eaten anything healthier than he should eat. He has hardly read the Bible. He is wearing blue and scarlet clothes.

In recent decades, relationships between patients and doctors have developed, one of which is a fatheristic doctor, and doctors make decisions based on their professional value. Letting adult patients make their own choices is called "informed consent". Informed consent has four important elements: disclosure, ability, understanding, and volunteer.

According to the research at the University of Chicago, physicians are characterized not only by the high percentage of doctors believing in God but also by the diversity of physician religion. Many American doctors are international medical graduates, so doctors claiming more general religion outside the United States are more representative, but few in the United States (Jews, Hindus, Muslims , Americans etc). Buddhism Interestingly, it was found that exposure to other religions helps to reduce the overall belief in the existence of divinity, but in the case of a doctor, the interaction with respected fellows of other religions is religious It seems not to reduce faith in. Faith Perhaps this is because the exposure of a medical colleague to other beliefs is not expected to cause people to suspect his or her belief but to happen at an older and unaffected age is there.

If euthanasia is legalized, please imagine the characteristics of the doctor. Does a doctor become a therapist or a murderer? Why doctors know whether suicide wish is depression or subtle pressure from family members? Already in the Netherlands suicide claims no longer require end-of-life patients. So, if you have the right to commit suicide, how can we restrict this "right" to the end disease?

The doctor accelerates death through the patient's request - a controversial feature is suicide by a doctor - once again becoming a prominent example of this problem. Doctors and nurses long been concerned that patients who gave up life support therapy for death committed suicide and that medical experts are helping suicide. Recently, these concerns seem to be important in biomedical ethics. There is a consensus on the legal and ethical aspects that refusing or revoking a virtually rejected treatment never violates the Code of Ethics. This consensus began with the development of the Karen Anne Quinlan case in 1976 and was ultimately formed around the US Supreme Court ruling, in particular the Kruzan case in 1990. The work of many philosophers and lawyers will help to form this consensus. The obvious part of consensus is that it is an ethical act that it does not stop or withdraw treatment for effective rejection.