Bernard Marx is an interesting character in the book "The Brave New World". At the beginning of the book he is a very important person, but as the book continued, he became increasingly placed in the context of the story. The reasons can be explained by the way in which his role changes as the book progresses. Aldous Huxley raised an interesting point by showing how to change people by getting what they want. It makes the reader wonder whether success will change them in the same way or whether they can maintain their personality.
In Hu's brave new world, there is a lie, false happiness. We (the reader) know that, and a part of the hero in the book (John's so-called "barbarians", Bernard Marx, Helmholtz-Watson etc.) knows this. It has never been clearly identified, false happiness is just a hint. Huxley may not do this to create a drama, but beyond the hint is too complex for the text.
There are many similarities between A Brave New World of Aldous Huxley and George Orwell 1984, but their similarities are quite different. The brave new world is a novel about the struggle of Bernard Marx and he rejects residents of society when he finds he is not really happy. 1984 was the story of Winston who found taboo love in social hypocrisy. In both cases, the hero quietly resisted his government, which proved to be useless after all. Huxley wrote a brave new world to a third party so readers can more fully understand the activities he presented. His role is shallow like a cartoon (Astrakhan) to better reflect their problematic society. In this society, the traditional concept of love and ideal has been ignored for a long time and should have been despised, "Mother, monogamous, romance. High fountain fountain, Wild Jet wild jet
People should suffer more than many people should be eroded. Under the control of the society that pressured the government, Bernard Marx often endured mental suffering due to his unorthodox view. In Adolf Huxley's "brave new world", the hero tried to express his hot and unhappy opinion, but the countries of the oppressed world succumbed to the society in a violent way and eventually struggle for exile I lost. Hexley explained the third-party technocratic government. There, signs of emotion became dangerous, extreme consumptionism was the core of society. However, what is more unpleasant is the unconscious natural regeneration by large-scale replication, which is basically confirming that it is a human loss. Through the brave new world, Huxley warned past governments trying to improve efficiency and stability, and continued to advise the modern world against increased government intervention.