Freedom of censorship reading is important for democratic lifestyles. But today this freedom is being attacked. Private groups and public institutions around the world excluded books and magazines from sales, excluded specific books from public schools, examined magazines and newspapers and silenced, and made controversial books and magazines for the general public I have restrictions. Inhibition of reading is suppression of creative thinking. It is not just books and magazines suppressed by political and social institutional pressure.
Boycott Review: New attributes that are becoming increasingly important in our modern digital society are censorship of resistance, by universal surveillance. In other words, it is difficult for an external stakeholder such as a company or a country to prevent the owner of the product from holding and using it. Censorship is the ideal choice for those living under the administration seeking to implement capital controls or ban all types of peaceful transactions. Gold is an obvious king of durability. The vast majority of gold mined or cast, including Pharaoh's gold, still exists, and it may become available 1000 years later. The gold coins that have been used as money for a long time still retain important value today. Fiat currency and bit coin are basically digital records and may take physical form (bank notes etc.).
In every madness around the world, the need to review the resistance to wealth storage is high and growing. Currently, markets that are under review of asset boycotting mainly include the gold market (estimated $ 6 trillion) and offshore banking operations (estimated $ 20 trillion). Since World War II, industrialized countries have experienced a very peaceful and stable era, but today it is not so. Even if the idea of reviewing the boycott is out of the question it is worth thinking about thinking about reviewing censorship of about $ 26 trillion (in the form of gold and offshore banks) is very important.
When I say a review, I am referring to the censorship system. In the United States there is a corporatist regime, there is no meaningful separation between government power and corporate power, so corporate media is government media, corporate censorship is government censorship. Legal sponsored senator to meet with wealthy social media stakeholders to discuss how to use Internet censorship to "prevent the discomfort of the US" at your Senate Judiciary Committee meeting When you are sponsored by, you gain government censorship