Censorship is Not an Effective Way to Protect Children

The talk of the teacher was interrupted, radio and TV people were dismissed, and the writer did not participate in the speech activity. Because their speech, opinion or performance contradicted what the minority considers appropriate. People think these censorships have occurred now rather than decades ago, and people are proud of their positive skills by opening their minds. However, censorship not only examines the violence of pornography and television, it is widely practiced not only in the United States today, but also in textbooks and classrooms to protect children.

The Iceland Constitution prohibits censorship, the tradition of protecting freedom of expression is broad and it extends to the use of the Internet. However, Iceland is concerned with the best way to protect children, fight against terrorism, prevent libel and protect the rights of copyright holders. Five Nordic countries of Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden and Iceland play a central role in the battle between European file sharing, rights holders and Internet service providers (ISPs). Each country has its own destiny, but in all legal disputes and trials the existence of EU is felt. Iceland is not a member of the European Union, but it is part of the European Economic Area (EEA) and agrees to enact legislation similar to the EU in areas such as consumer protection and commercial law.

There are many options to review by the government to prevent abuse of the network, which has the same effect as review. Mr. Hentoff said, "If there is no intervention in the bill there is a way to protect the child, blockade in specific areas, passwords, parental supervision. Under protection of the first amendment adults are under government control If the examination request is passed, the first amendment may be effectively excluded from cyberspace "(Hentoff 1)

In the United States, excuses of censorship are usually expressed in the following format - "The first amendment only protects the speech from the US federal government." If this ruling later did not violate the first amendment, review It will not be. In other words, review was done by organizations other than the US government, so it was not actually reviewed. Of course, this is wrong. Because it is based on the cyclic definition of censorship, the above excuses are incorrect. What is needed is a useful definition of censorship. Fortunately, once you understand that this is a concept preceding the US Constitution, reviewing the definition is easy. In the simplest terms, censorship is suppression of information and ideas. Most private amateurs can tell you because our private life is being increasingly influenced by censorship of social media