Cather in the Rye

Even today, the catcher and the wheat field are very controversial books. Many schools and libraries across the country ban this book for various reasons. This article will explore why this book still triggers some of the reasons educators claim. The first thing to understand is why this book caused so much controversy, we must see the time it was written in the 1950s. In the 1950s, the world has just recovered from the destruction of World War II which ended five years ago. America is an American lifestyle that is envied by superpowers, the wealthiest countries, and all the western countries.

"Rye fruit" was published in 1951. It is this time that Americans are afraid of the nuclear war, more specifically the vision of the bomb that embodies it. There is a possibility that the power to produce infinite wealth, not complete reversal, destroys this idyllic world. Therefore, in the culture of the 1950s and 1960s, signs of resistance are seen. The fear and fear the American citizen is lurking begins to bubble under the "quiet" surface of certain American habits. You can see that the possibility of death on a global scale leads to the expression of a provocative protagonist in novels and movies. This is the process of heroic creation - an outsider moving between fragile mysticism and perfect separation in the process of finding alternatives to orthodox culture. Among these heroes, Jim Stark comes from Rebel Without Cause, or Johnny Strabler of The Wild One, and of course Holden Caulfield of The Catcher in the Rye.

The adolescence of the watcher's language in the wheat field is the central theme of many novels, but JD Salinger's "Observer in the wheat field" is the main content of the academic curriculum that captured this stage for a long time was. Spirit live in an extremely sensitive form, directing a dramatic reaction with the vulgar words of Holden Caulfield. As an autobiographical record of Halden Caulfield, a student before graduating from a fictional university, "The Catcher in the Rye" deals with social scandals of the time (Gwynn, 1958). As a young man who is emotional, intellectual, curious, sensitive to pain, Holden is his inner, through his gender, the gender of the elders, the doctrine of his education, and his own new self-awareness I will test the world. Over the years, the words of this story shocked several readers. (Bloom, 1990). In today's novel, Holden's speech is faithful to the youth's oral address.