Category:American legal scholars

This category is for articles from legal scholars from North American countries.

Category: People: by occupation: scholar / jurist: law scholars: by nationality: United States of America

The term "Indian" is itself a category created by religiously contextualized legal and cultural discourse that gives Europeans and Americans access to territory and resources. Colonist scholar Jodie A. Bird pointed out in the history that "Indians and Indians became the existential foundation of American settlers colonialism and solved imperialism of itself." The ambiguity of others helps to define the United States and is not realistic. Judith Butler explained that the realization of 'other' does not mean it is alive or dead, meaning it is an infinite spectrum. how is it? Impact of persistent threats or actions of their own

The identity in the American Indian community is controversial, even among law scholars, federal policy makers, anthropologists, historians and even Native Americans. Because American Indians have a unique relationship with the United States, their identity has been redefined and restructured over the past century and a half. This places a heavy burden on the definition of legal objectives and tribal affiliation and American Indians trying to prove their identity in a multicultural context. Is there a proper way to identify and define who the American Indians are? One way is to use blood volume to define the identity. This is a figurative structure to track individuals and groups' ancestors.

According to CLS scholars, the legal doctrine is limited and incomplete. The doctrine of law can only provide a narrow world view. Robert Gordon believes legal doctrine covers abstraction and poverty categories. For example, primitive categories of people in criminal law, contract law, family law (see below) are based on complex interpersonal relationships, but do not reflect or spontaneously represent what is happening . Regarding the Penal Code, M Kelmen used the example of his wife who was abused by her husband and killed her husband. Then she asked for provocative defense. The question is whether the judge will adopt a narrow "time frame" or a wide "time frame". No one can certainly say which law applies to this. The alleged criminals are considered in a narrow period and the other may be regarded as an extensive violator.