Categorizing of People in Shakespeare’s Tempest and Dante’s Inferno

Shakespeare's Character Classification Storm and Dante's Hell Shakespeare's Storm and Dante's Hell shows the idea of ​​using "splitting practice" for Foucault's classification and subjectivity. (Rabinow 8) Foucault believes that people can take power through discourse. Please define these categories. (Rabinou 8) Examples of such people are homosexuals, crazy men, criminals, and undeveloped people.

Both Shakespeare's "King Lear" and "Dante's Hell" explored the causes and consequences of human suffering. Each work assumes that human suffering comes from a choice made. The statement applies not only to the characters of each work but also to readers. Hell and King Learn tell the general truth about human condition: pain is inevitable and inevitable. Both King Lear and Inferno are focusing on advice and mourning about human suffering, but one of the main differences between these works is that Inferno conveys the desirable aspect.

Inferno of Dante Alighieri was carefully woven to reflect the reality of the time. Florentine writer Dante uses various hell circles to tell stories in a systematic and detailed way with nine hell (Havely, 374). But the interesting thing is how Dante explains the character as they are seen as facing a tragedy in their hell life. The author of this medieval text classifies various types of crimes

In Dante Alighieri The Inno, perceived by The Inferno, the poet Dante Alighieri emphasizes perception; through sight, the pilgrim Dante can recognize and learn his experience in hell. Since pilgrim Dante is often attracted to a specific image, vision plays an important role in work. The sight of the sinner carries Dante, as a result the sinner is attracted to Dante and Virgil. It seems that Dante is observing everything