Case for Christianity

The claim of Christian's moral belief is what everyone should have. It is essential, at least hypothetical. Luis said to the book "S. Christian Cases" that it is part of the "moral law". Even if there is the possibility of being at risk, we will not let others forget by forgetting ourselves, but marrying others or destroying our moral code makes me sad. That's it, you set your own ethics.

This is the last part of our "Christian Case" series. In historical affairs, I tried to keep three premises of Christianity truth. Some premises say the Bible is a reliable historical document. I examined how he knows the Bible is completely attributed to historical problems and how he knows what the Bible authors assert. Premise 2 points out that according to this historical testimony there is a reason to believe that Jesus is the person he claims, the god in the flesh. Our last premise is that Jesus taught that the Bible is not merely a reliable historical document but the word of God. This is his word because Jesus tells us that he is a God and that the Bible is his own word. Since the Bible teaches Christianity, Christianity is the truth.

There are lots of reference to Jesus in the reading of the Hebrew Bible. This can take the form of a specific prophecy, and in other cases, by type or by a pioneer. Traditionally, most Christians read about the Bible that almost all prophecies are about the coming of Jesus, the entire Old Testament of the Bible is a prophecy about the coming of Jesus. Professor Catholic special Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ("there is no salvation outside the church"), some of which are interpreted as being limited to the Catholic redemption. At the same time, it does not deny that people who are not obvious members of the Church are also likely to be saved.

When bringing up a lawsuit against Christian faith, Christians often quote passage of the Bible to maintain their arguments. Atheists want to congratulate Christians for cycling inferences and end the conversation. But when using the Bible to build the Bible is it necessarily circular? The answer is no. This is the reason. If you want to judge the authenticity of the insisted historical text, you first need to know what the historical text actually is. We need to know what will be served first. And we need to start checking whether these things are valid.