Captial Punishment: Just or Unjust?

There are various forms of punishment, but a definite end of life will cause feelings to all people, not just those who are directly affected, and will challenge the ethics of the death penalty. At the center of the controversy there are two educational appraisals and the abolitionist is trying to prove that the death penalty is unnecessary and unfair, but the supporters are arguing against them. AIDS abolitionist Jacques Greenberg wrote in his article "The US death penalty eradication system" not only can not prevent it in the current system, but also because it is unfairly enforced due to court prejudice ing.

Throughout human history, there was always a rule on revenge against fair and unfair practices. Not only the unjust punishment, but also the rewards just received. This is as old a law as time. The philosophy on unfair treatment is the most controversial both today and through history; this is the moral determination of the death penalty. This controversial death penalty has been going on for centuries. Its history can be traced back to 399 BC when Socrates had to drink Tsuga for "young corruption" and "hearing impaired".

There are two kinds of laws: justice and injustice. Saint Augustine said: "Unfair laws are not law at all." There is a set of criteria to decide whether the law is fair or unfair. Fairness law is a law that harmonizes with the law of God. On the contrary, the unfair law is a law incompatible with God's law and natural law. If the law enhances the character of a person, that law is fair. If the law lowers individuals and their personality, that law is unfair. Martin Luther King stated that separation is unfair for "distorting the soul and hurting the personality" (King). People involved in separation have erroneous superiority to people under pressure. As a result, oppressed people feel inferiority complex. Therefore apartheid is unjust and immoral and should be condemned as sin against God and humanity. A well-known existential theologian Paul Tillich defines sin as being separated from God. Separation is separation, so separation is sin

All laws promoting personality are fair. Any law that lowers personality is unfair. Apartheid warps the soul and hurts the personality, so all apartheid laws are unfair. It gives a separatist a false sense of superiority and separates false inferiority complex. Therefore, separation is politically, economically and socially unhealthy, but also morally wrong and sinful. Most white Americans today blame apartheid and deny it or its loyalty. However, looking at the separation from the point of view of King, even if they are not racist or racist, there is a tendency to treat people who maintain and maintain the status and power of power as apartheid.