Cannibalism Among Dinosaurs

People like dinosaurs are most likely to see and hear new breakthrough news about scientific breakthroughs when people browse various newspapers or watch night news . When I browsed through various scientific journals, I found an article that draws my attention, especially one, for several reasons. The title of the article is "a cannibal dinosaur displayed with a tooth mark". These prehistoric creatures are commonly regarded as wild and furious beasts for centuries and are currently being seen.

As explained in detail at the colorful new exhibition of the American Museum of Natural History held in New York on 21st March - "Dinosaurs in us" - birds are direct descendants of the animal leg dinosaurs. These creatures are smaller than many other dinosaurs, walking 2 feet, being covered with feathers, and possibly flying. This is not a new idea. It was originally proposed by British biologist Thomas Huxley in the 19th century. But Mark Norell, curator of paleontology in AMNH, stated that it was soon ignored in the next 130 years. However, in the last 25 years, scientific agreement is suitable for this point. "The new feature here is that all of our latest technologies convey more information than we think about dinosaurs and birds," Norell said.

Dinosaurs no longer exist, and humans are the best among the big animals. The history of dinosaurs shows how fragile this position is. Techniques may help human survival, but the study showed that mass extinction of other animals is ongoing due to habitat destruction, hunting, climate change and other factors. In the survey in 2017, it was found that almost half of the 177 mammals investigated lost more than 80% of the distribution between 1900 and 2015.

No! After dinosaur extinction, people have appeared on earth for nearly 65 million years. However, during the age of dinosaurs, small mammals (including size primates) are still alive. Many scientists who study dinosaurs (vertebrate paleontologists) now believe that birds are direct descendants of a series of carnivorous dinosaurs and believe that they actually represent modern dinosaurs. This theory is still under discussion and it shows that there are still many dinosaurs.

When asked to an ordinary paleontologist familiar with vertebrate phylogeny, it may be said that a bird is a dinosaur. With appropriate terms, birds are dinosaurs of birds, other dinosaurs are dinosaurs other than birds, and birds (sounds strange) are technically considered reptiles. Is it too technical? Only semantics? Perhaps, still a good science. In fact, the majority of evidence supports birds as descendants of Manilapuran dinosaurs, which are similar (but not identical) to small dramasosau. What is this evidence?