Canada's Multicultural Identity

Who are the Canadians? There is no clear definition. A thousand years ago, Canadians were Native Americans 300 years ago, Canadians were French settlers. Today, we do not have a single definition. People moved to Canada from every corner of the globe. We are no longer wearing a coat Dubois fur cap or a British soldier. There are few Canadians who can say that they are from North America. This is a collage of various races, religions, and languages, but all Canadians have one thing in common.

Of course, since we are a multicultural country, Canadians know more about the possibilities of other cultures and languages. Canadian identity is often described as a multicultural mosaic. Immigrants from this country bring a wealth of knowledge - the most important is their understanding of other international languages. It is very important that second generation and third generation rookers never lose this language knowledge base. If parents are proud of their culture and understand that the language is an international passport, future generations will want to learn only the language of their parents.

Canada is highly acclaimed internationally for its diversity and multiculturalism efforts. But recently banning wearing Nicab at the citizenship ceremony in Canada has challenged the Canadian identity as a multicultural country. This issue is considered a dilemma for religious and cultural practices of immigrants and for the protection of women's rights. In this article we propose three positions on this issue - firstly, even if we can use Nikab with citizenship ceremony, we will not affect gender equality. Secondly, I borrowed from the conceptual framework of rational adaptation and made a normative discussion to adapt to Nika. Third, I believe that the elitist process where the state makes decisions is a democratic misconduct.

Dilemma of 'Rational adaptation' in Canadian multiculturalism: Niquab's decision of state ban on state oath ceremony