Can Leaders Be Followers?

Mr. Susan Wong, Apple's financial analyst, said "Excellent leaders are also excellent supporters." "This may sound like a paradox," she continues, "But in my experience, I hope that good leaders understand restrictions and accept reasonable proposals from believers I realized that. "

Too many leaders believe that they should know everything about it, can do it all and take responsibility at all times. But Susan says that the supreme leader is self-conscious enough to realize his limits, that they are safe enough to know that if they let go, someone else is taking charge of control It reminds me

The secret of high performance is not only excellent leader but also excellent leadership. In terms of skills and abilities as well as the best execution organization focus, we will continue through this lens, looking at leadership, so if you follow this process, not people, this means that we follow people It is something to ask.

Creativity that allows organizations to make changes that realize value and vision

The strengths and talents of others help to achieve common values ​​and vision, team ability is beyond our team.

Our heart and respect for those who enable us to accomplish something special

From this point of view, we are all believers in a way - a way to change the world. Leaders demand that people follow the process and leaders should always consider themselves as followers

With the leader in mind, leadership can move up, down, left and right within the organization. Leaders will consider what is best for them and what is best for their duties.

Another important reason the leader obeys. No one can do it alone. As the leader of the leader's idea - Super superior personality personality, one-handed charging charisma, white horse soldier salvage spirit who must be required to do better than anyone else than anyone else. But what happens when we leave this heroic myth and notice that the leader is not independent from others? But, more importantly, are they dependent on others' energy and effort? As for what will happen, we are more effective as a leader. We recognize what we can not do by this alone, then we will bring out all the possibilities to the utmost and start using it.

There are three main elements that can improve the efficiency of the leader: follower characteristics, task characteristics, and leader behavior. The first component consists of two sets of follow variables. Depending on the first set of functions Northouse (eg association required, control structure of preference and desire) (2016) to determine whether leader 's action leads the believers' satisfaction. Another set of variables measures the self-awareness of the follower's ability to achieve the goal. These characteristics affect leaders, as his or her leadership behavior affects the fans' motivation.

It is difficult to have believers without a leader. Many management studies focus on individual leadership attributes of the hierarchical system. Leaders and believers in the traditional sense have seen that leaders obey, motivated, and obey him or her through return. The leader also decides who the follower should be. People are regarded as leaders and they will motivate them and support them at the moment. Another difference from traditional management is that there is no single "boss" because people need to be connected in different circumstances. From the perspective taken here, if a person has only one leader, it may argue that it is very problematic. This implies loss of cognitive function, worse blindness as attention as a default condition causing a single point of failure.