The California State Assembly and the Pistol Control California State Assembly are currently discussing bills that require pistol owners to obtain state permission. In the discussion on Law 273, someone insists that in order to "protect our children" from gun violence, we must provide more rules to gun owners who comply with the law It will be certain. However, looking at the statistics of Orange County, it is clear that other things are more harmful to children than guns.
Conservatives correctly raised a storm protesting the loose nation of US border management. Background check is pistol border control - the wall is to prevent people from illegally getting a pistol. If you think that the United States should set up barriers to block illegal entry, you should also support a general identity survey to prevent illegal weapons relocation. In fact, this means that pistol personal sales should be prohibited. The only way to make a universal identity survey reasonable is to ban the sales of pistols without federal permission. According to the current law, two civilians can buy and sell guns with almost no limit. Because the gun control law relies on Congress to regulate the power of interstate trade. It will be complicated if they live in different states). But if nothing else happens, Congress should be able to ban the sale of personal pistols for national security reasons.
Only the owner of the gun may not be affected by gun control laws. Gun dealers, manufacturers and owner of non-guns are also affected. The owner of the pistol is most affected. California is currently trying to pass the law prohibiting pistol. However, when the owner of the rifle and shotgun let go of the pistol, no one can stick to it. The Legislature said that they did not intend to stop hunting, but it was meaningless to take the pistol to protect and keep people rifle (if it was a sport it was equally fatal Most owners who do not have guns do not care what happens, but they should. Congress has worked on an easy way to solve this problem