By the time he came, we <left/ had left> [simple past vs past perfect]

If this is what I mean, this is correct, but it means "when you go home" or "if not", strictly it is not "before you go home." "Until that time" means "to when" or "not later", and is not only "before".

If my teacher says that I have to go to work on Friday, that is the time before classes on Friday or Friday. As soon as I arrive home I finish my homework, if it is not before, I will finish my homework when I get home. Maybe when I got through, I saw the problem and advanced all the answers in my head, but there was no way to sit and write on paper before arriving home. Therefore, I can not say "I always finish my homework if I arrive," but I can say, "I will finish my homework when I arrive all the time."

At least this is what I mean for "on time". In fact, if "on time" means strictly "before", you only need to use "before" or complete tense, or "finish your homework", and "time passes" There is no need to say.

Perhaps the real problem is related to "I am at home." Beyond the threshold, after walking through the room to the desk, probably after I came home, I had no time to do something as soon as possible or when I arrived.

In this case, the dissent opinion of Dell Texas applies (except for the phrase "perfect"), the problem is not a grammatical problem but a logical problem, or a consistency problem.

I will give another explanation. "Things to do" means "always doing" and "doing things often," and deliberate ideas emerge. It will prove my intention is consistent with the "timely" argument.

In British English, the use of Simple Past and Present Perfect is very strict. Given past time expressions, you must use simple past. If you do not have a word to draw attention, you need to decide whether you are talking about past actions or whether the result is important.

Completeness is a tension that does not exist in all languages ​​now. For example, since Past Simple can be used to express the same content as Perfect Perfect in English, it is not used in Russian. Still, because English increases the opportunity to clarify the relationship between past and present, there is no advantage for Russia. We usually use Present Perfect to show that what happened in the past relates to what is happening now. In this case, it is necessary to be simple (sometimes) simple or past, so we will not use the current full at this time.

please tell me. The story is a tense tense verb of the past tense (the past is the past but the past is perfect, the past is gentle, the past is gentle, sometimes the past meaning) and the order showing the past time series (represented by those adverbs) proper noun (name) Place) In addition, research on narrative structure (see Bardovi-Harlig's work) points out two main parts that make up the story: (1) Expressing your art; noun - quality, production, According to expression or field, aesthetic principle, it is beautiful, attractive, or more than normal. Art stimulates our thinking and helps advance the studies. Art is therapeutic, preparing for the future of students, building communities, it is hard to discard art classes at school. It is a therapeutic session for many people to express themselves through art. It will provide

It is this generation that there are young generation enthusiastic students. In the past, when ááopoc wrote a poem, áoc joined the struggle, then he left the area. After that he returned to Hue to establish People's Court and distributed death sentences to all the groups; then he stood at the end of the hole at his old classmate or friend who had previously had a difference, The execution of death sentences by hand. A ̄c friend named MáouTÃ 1/2 raised a red armband, a banner of the People's Liberation Army and begged Äaoc.

https://the-.eye.eu/public/concen.org/Nonfiction.Eack.Pack.Oct.2015-PHC/9780253014177.Indiana%20University%20Press.Mourning%20Headband%20for%20Hue_% 20An% 20Account% 20of% Article 20% 20% Battle of 2 20 %% 2 C% 20 Vietnam% 201968. Nha% 20 Ca.2014.pdf