In the past few years, the school seems to have lost contact with students' discipline. Because school shooting and violent behavior frequently occurs, it seems that students operate programs, not teachers and administrators. There are many factors to make a good classroom or a bad classroom. From the way the teacher punishes the student who did the wrong action and the way to give the remuneration when doing the right thing until the way parents participate in the child's education.
In establishing discipline in the classroom, Charles (2011) presented a very brief summary of the theoretical principles described above and the guiding principles for applying them to individual classroom management plans. Authority is an important element in the classroom, but it tends to be misunderstood. Having effective authority does not mean that there must be an authoritarian teacher who requires students to obey. The atmosphere of the classroom should begin to cooperate with the teacher. The most effective authoritative application of teachers in the classroom is authoritative and not an authoritarian style. Teachers should use their authority wisely and demonstrate their willingness and ability to undertake the role of leadership. The role of leadership should be used by relying on rationality and persuasion rather than obeying the requirement.
Frederick H. Jones, who writes active teaching discipline and active class instruction, defines class discipline as "establishing a joint class to maximize learning standards and reduce interference" (Chemlynski, 42). He is one of many researchers who are studying the time, manners, causes, and the most effective way of correcting children's behavior. There are two types of discipline: passive and active (Ban, 257). When teachers are not planning to respond because they do not anticipate bad behavior, reactive training occurs naturally. With this improvisation method, the teacher will be in survival mode. He / she has moved from one problem to another all the way (Petterle, 28). This leads to a structural contradiction that detracts from the authority and credibility of the teacher (Ban, 257)