Buddha vs. Zarathustra

Why did Buddha and Zaratustra suffer? This is a question people have been trying to answer for decades. The two men attacked the problem from different angles. Their names are Buddha and Zarathustra. The Buddha is Indian and has created the way of thinking in the East. Zarathustra comes from Persia and believes in Western theology. Zarathustra is a wealthy man who was living a normal life before he was twenty. He left his family and wandered all over the country for ten years. An angel finally appeared to him; an angel said there was only one god in Zarathustra.

This book documented Zarathustra's fictional travel and speech. The same name of Zarathustra is usually the founder of Zoroastrianism called Zoroaster (Avestan: Zara θuštra) in English. Nietzsche is clearly "new" or "different" Zarathustra, depicting a man with a traditional morality in mind. He continued to explain the meaning of the name of Zarathustra in my mouth, the mouth of the first immoralist said: "The Persians' great historical identity is quite the opposite. Zarathustra It is the first person to regard the struggle between good and evil as a circle of things.To change the morality to the field of metaphysics as power, reason, purpose is itself his work Zarathustra created this most devastating mistake, morality Therefore, he must first recognize it.

In the picture at the beginning of "Zarathustra", three different ontological human existence spaces and four human types are introduced. These spaces are 1) pure realm: Zaratu Stella is alone with his animals and marks the sun and dawn and dusk they are coming and going with. When Zarathustra left the field, he expressed his desire to return to mankind, but he must first encounter 2) culture - poetry - narrative field. In addition to the contractual arrangements and the political bondage of dealings, we have found a poetic story that organized all human lives. The old saint who occupied this space seems to have never heard that "God is dead" in his forest. This ancient saint has never heard news about God's death in his forest! "And each ontological space will define justice in a different but related way.

Therefore, Srac Zlatatustra is the most strange book in the Western philosophy tradition. This is the simulated gospel: it compares Zarathustra's argument with action in the Bible It is full of Scripture sermons, but it also severely condemns Christianity and blunt the Bible or sacred thought . People Zarathustra is essentially a person who praises laughter and even laughs himself. Even so, this book is also very uneven. Nietzsche wrote this in his 10-day inspiration, and apparently he did not modify his work very carefully. This book takes longer than it takes, and is usually self-destructive and clumsy. Nietzsche seems not confident about the extent he wants to participate in fables and symbols, and how much he wants to explain the problem. But in the best situation, Zarathustra is definitely a masterpiece.