Brown vs. Board of Education

It is possible for a brave girl and her father to defend their rights bravely by trying to apply the 14 th revision. "Linda Brown was born in Topeka, Kansas on February 20, 1942. She was forced to go to elementary school because of apartheid, her father was one of the plaintiffs of Brown v. Board of Education.1954 Judgment that the separation of the Supreme Court school of the year is illegal ("Biography of Linda Brown").

Collection for Brown's Board of Education: Interview Record, Communication, Crop, Copy of the Branch of Royal Book, Explanation of Richard Kruger's book "Simple Justice: Brown and Board of Education". Kruger's interview record, whether direct or posted, is the core of this series, with over 100 people. In particular, Alexander Bickel, Hugo L. Black, Esther Brown, Linda Braun, John W. Davis, Felix Frankfurt, William H. Hassy, ​​Kenneth B. Clark, Charles H. Houston, Sirgood Copies of correspondence documents related to the case of Marshall, William H. Rinkist and Elbow Kruger's Color Improvement Association (NAACP) are also included in the collection, as well as two unpublished manuscripts by Phyllis Kluger. "And the book, the long history of black education

One example is the relationship with Brown's Board of Education. Due to the popular popularity of Brown and the Board of Education, this incident has been forgotten over time. Brown is more popular than the Board of Education, but both cases are important and there are many similarities. The only difference is that the first one was done the second seven years ago, and that was a racial difference. These two situations are important in many respects, but the only problem is why only one is recorded and the other is not recorded.

In 1956 (two years after Brown and the Board of Education finished separation, but finished an equal educational practice), the National Color Improvement Association said it came time to challenge the separate but equal provision of Hill-Burton's Act It was judged. The first case was the executive committee of Eaton and James Walker Memorial Hospital raised by three African-American doctors who were deprived of their privileges. They believe that they discriminated against the 14th amendment, as the hospital received the Federal Fund. They failed at the district level and the level of appeal, and the Supreme Court refused to review the case. But the three judges objected.