Breaking the Law or Civil Desobedience

Civil disobedience has no legal rights but is moral, but only when the government eliminates fundamental human rights, not at all times. As a UN researcher, Chemi bin Noon has not complied with the main duty of the law unless it is rooted in justice, freedom, equality.In accordance with civil law responsibilities, it does not necessarily follow the law, democracy It is the foundation of. " In order to become a responsible member of a democratic society, I think that I do not mind breaking the unjust law.

Civil disobedience means that you are breaking the law for higher reasons or because the law is unfair. Citizen resistance is to enforce the law broken by the state. War Resistance International divides non-violent direct action into seven principles. The choice of means that coincides with the goal, distinction between action and actor, pursuit of comprehensive solution, refusal of retaliation and flight, openness, choice of transparency and credibility, and change of anger I will not give up on anger We exercise power by changing ourselves and stopping cooperation

There are various opinions as to whether citizen's disobedience is a moral responsibility of the citizen. Disobedience of citizens is a non-violent protest. It usually involves violations of established laws. Those who do not consider this a moral responsibility of the citizen will say that citizens should not impair existing laws and should not violate existing laws. People in this camp sometimes claim we will not agree with the law. There are other ways to bring about change, such as talking with the representatives chosen in the election, without civic disobedience in an aggressive form.

From a certain point of view, the law on civil disobedience is very easy. By definition, civil disobedience involves intentional destruction of the law. Activists who occupy the Calgary office of the Environment Minister have no right to hinder the use of the office. These protesters are guilty if prosecuted unless the court finds that the law is unconstitutional and rarely happens. The law was broken to point out serious problems - Canada refused to take big steps to limit climate change - this has nothing to do with the conviction. Motivation is established by Canadian law - reasons people violate the law - not related to guilt or innocence

Citizen's disobedience is regarded as contempt of law, but Martin Luther King believes citizen's disobedience is respect and expression of law. To arouse the conscience of legal injustice in society and to accept punishment in prison, it is to express the highest respect for the law at that time. "When the 1689 Bill of Rights was recorded, the last Catholic monarchy was abolished, and the co-monarchs of men and women were promoted, its early successful practice was achieved during the British nonviolent glory revolution It was. British Midland Enlightenment expressed opposition to being regarded as illegal and then formed a way to bring legal consequences.