Bowenian Family Therapy

Bowen's family therapy is the first treatment I have encountered and completely distinguishes therapist and family. The therapist's role in this type of treatment is to work as a coach. He / she is still outside of the emotional tangle that exists within the family, and still does not respond to situations and remarks that may occur during treatment. As a coach, the therapist helps families understand the patterns that exist in their families through deeper insights and opportunities for family changes and choices.

Bowenian: This form of family therapy is best suited for situations where other families can not or do not want to participate in treatment. Bowen therapy is based on two core concepts: triangulation (which tends to make you feel sick through conversation with a third party) and distinction (learning is not emotional in family relationships). Structure: Structural handling focuses on coordination and strengthening of the family system to set appropriate boundaries for both children and adults and ensure protection by parents. With this type of treatment, therapists "join" families to observe, learn and improve their ability to help strengthen relationships with their families.

There are various methods of family counseling, such as structure, psychoanalysis, Bowen, experience, and other projects. This article focuses on aspects of cognitive-behavior family therapy. Early in the family therapy campaign, this approach was somewhat suspected by a more traditional family counselor. They believe that the depth of technology is not enough to deal with the complexity and dynamics of family dysfunction. In the early days, this approach was thought to help families with counseling for disabled children, but it evolved into a wider range of applications. Only in the past decade cognitive behavioral therapy itself is the main way of family counseling itself. (Leahy, R. 2004)

Bowen's family treatment is a common treatment, but both therapists and therapists demonstrate the effectiveness of this method, but empirical evidence supporting this method is currently limited. Although the foundation of evidence is expanding, the more data from an objective information source in particular, the more useful it is to confirm its effectiveness. The second criticism against this method is the seemingly unwaver neutrality of the performer. Some experts in psychiatric disorders are all expensive to be neutral, unaffected, or silent, but practitioners of family system therapy may tolerate harmful behavior.