Book Report On "the Lost World"

Book Review on "The Lost World": The main character of the book is Ian Malcolm, middle-aged mathematician, and explorer. Richard Levine, the founder of the explorer, is a wealthy, reckless and famous adventurer who spends a lot of time and money spending time exploring the world and helping junior high school students provide scientific career ideas . Sarah Harding is a zoologist who is hired to handle certain animals.

Yesterday's world was one of the wonderful autobiography. This book has changed you. For the lost world, this is a sorrow of sorrow - in fact, I lament the two lost worlds and prosecute one-third of my anger. The writer was born in 1881 to a wealthy Jewish family in Vienna. He called it "golden age of security." He wrote that the structure of society "exists for sustainability." If life is predictable in an orderly manner, rich exist, and the rest have a more rigorous model, more equitable rights and the possibility of self improvement. Stability itself is respected. "This sense of security is an asset owned by millions of people, that is desirable, the ideal of life shared by everyone."

Erdrich's new book is full of stories of lost love, lost identity, forgotten danger, illness and death. But most importantly, the "final report" - lyrical, interesting and attractive - is about those who are not overwhelmed by the loss of survival. Agnes has lived a very rich life despite depriving her of her rights. "Agnes must experience the fact that she has an amazing incentive to follow what her spirit requires, she follows it, it is very difficult," Erdrich said about her heroine . "Perhaps this is what it means, what can I say if it is autobiographical?" She laughed. "Rui is difficult to survive, Rui has problems with the survival of Rui."

I hope this is an isolated example. According to a large and in-depth study by Notre Dame sociologist Christian Smith, and reported in his new book "Lost in transition period", this is clearly not the case. Smith and his colleagues report on universal moral relativism and what they call "moral individualism" among Americans between the ages of 18 and 23. I have the respondents speak for himself: Q: If it is good for you, is it safe to break a moral rule? Can you escape to escape? A: Do you break the moral rules? I am sorry, what does the ethical code mean? In some cases, I have to say, yes, that is not a problem. However, it really depends on what these rules are. This is case by case